• Home
  • New initiatives
  • Partners
  • Tools
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Opportunities
  • Contact

Balancing conflicting human values for seagrass, saltmarsh and mangroves

  • Posted by Chris Brown
  • On July 25, 2020

The coast sits the intersection of many human activities. Management of coastal ecosystems is challenged by the conflicting values that humans hold for the coasts, including conservation, shipping, fishing, aquaculture, recreation and many others.

One objective of the Global Wetlands Project is to help find ways that management can balance these different values for coasts and secure conservation of coastal wetlands. In this post I’ll discuss some of the science we’ve completed so far on this topic and where we will go next.

Coastal wetlands are under intense pressure from activities that span multiple jurisdictions, in fact, they face more threats simultaneously than most other ocean ecosystems. These threats stem from human activities on land, such as agriculture that causes pollution, human carbon emissions that are causing climate change, and human activities in the ocean.

A detailed review of management in place for seagrass ecosystems found that management in most places only addressed a handful of the multitude of threats that seagrass meadows face. But, some examples of integrated plans that simultaneously dealt with multiple stressors show that it is possible to protect coastal wetlands, even in places of intense human pressures.

Addressing the three drivers of threat that coastal wetlands face – land, sea and climate – is complex, because the drivers operate at different scales, and so actions are needed across jurisdictions. We identified globally where there were mismatches between the actions needed to mitigate threats and the policies that are currently in place. For instance, the coastal zone of many nations is subject to high levels of human threats, but those nations are lacking management policies that cross the coastal zone.

Per cent of threats faced by ocean ecosystems that are caused by land-based or climate drivers. The prevalence of threats that are caused by climate change and human activities on land means action to conservation coastal ecosystems needs to span jurisdictions. Source: Tulloch et al. 2020 Biological Conservation

Mangrove ecosystems have some of the highest threat levels of any coastal ecosystem type. We studied associations between mangrove forest loss and the threats they face. Surprisingly, there was not a strong relationship between the rate of forest loss and the level of threat, at the global scale.

This may be because the threat data we used predicts the highest threats near urbanized areas. However, a key driver of mangrove loss is conversion of forest to shrimp ponds, which often occurs on rural coastlines. So while mangroves near cities may face high pressure from exploitation and future risks from development and ‘coastal squeeze’, forests on rural coastlines can also be subject to high rates of loss.

We also found that protected areas had lower rates of mangrove loss, but only in countries that had overall poorer capacity to manage environmental protections. This counter-intuitive result makes sense when you consider that mangroves are often protected outside of parks too, such as by fish habitat legislation. Therefore it seems that countries with good capacity to enforce protections can protect mangroves everywhere, whereas parks are important in countries that have more limited capacity to manage forests.

Overall the study highlights the importance of having region specific management actions to address mangrove loss.

Our next steps are to apply these methodologies that we’ve developed for studying threats, trends and management of coastal wetlands to all coastal wetland habitat types. This will form the basis of our global-scale, but regionally relevant, index of the status of coastal wetlands.

 

 

0 Comments

Recent Posts
  • Smarter monitoring for healthier oceans: How the GLOW team uses FishID
  • Mapping shellfish reefs in southeast Queensland for protection, management and restoration
  • New Paper: Integrating socioeconomic and ecological data into restoration practice
  • Fish AI Consortium Presentation: Rapid improvements in fisheries monitoring with underwater computer vision
  • Co-occurrence of ecosystem services to inform global mangrove conservation planning
Archives
  • May 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • April 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • August 2023
  • November 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • November 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
Categories
  • Blue Carbon
  • Communication
  • Conference
  • Conservation
  • FishID projects
  • Jobs
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Research
  • Uncategorized

Long-distance sea turtle migration provides unique opportunity to combine and test exciting tracking techniques

Previous thumb

Cautious optimism for the mighty Indian Sundarbans mangrove forest

Next thumb
Scroll
PhD APPLICATIONS OPEN

Range of projects available with up to $15,000 funds for field work and collaborative travel.

Find out more

PARTNERING FOR CHANGE

GLOW is proud to be an active member of the Global Mangrove Alliance.

Check out the GMA website

@2018 Griffith University, CRICOS Provider - 00233E. Images: Tom Rayner, Anusha Rajkaran and via Creative Commons.
  • Home
  • New initiatives
  • Partners
  • Tools
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Opportunities
  • Contact