• Home
  • New initiatives
  • Partners
  • Tools
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Opportunities
  • Contact

Transforming multiple stressor science to enhance coastal wetland protection

  • Posted by Kai Ching Cheong
  • On November 30, 2022

By Andria Ostrowski

Stressors rarely remain static in the environment, yet we continue to conduct multi-stressor experiments under highly controlled conditions, keeping stressors constant over time. So, what happens when stressors fluctuate? This is the question we explored in our new study, published in Ecology Letters. We found that how stressors are introduced elicits different biological responses in seagrasses.

Seagrasses provide critical habitat for wildlife, from shrimp to sea turtles and dugongs. These marine plants also stabilise sediments, store carbon, protect coastlines, and improve coastal water quality.

Despite widespread benefits, seagrasses are disappearing globally. Human activities play a major role in this loss by introducing multiple co-occurring stressors to the environment, such as pollutants, physical disturbance, and increasing temperatures. This means that seagrasses can be simultaneously affected by two or more stressors.

Seagrass ecosystems provide services that are of ecological and economic importance, yet they continue to face immense threats from human pressures worldwide.

It is critical to understand how these multiple stressors interact to impact seagrass habitats so that we can better manage adverse effects. We derive this understanding from experiments conducted in the lab or field. Typically, we test for the effects of multiple stressors under highly controlled, static conditions, where stressor intensity stays constant throughout the experiment. However, this ignores dynamic environmental changes that occur in coastal ecosystems.

We evaluated the effects of changes in stressor intensity (i.e., fluctuations) and synchronicity (i.e., timing of fluctuations) on seagrass responses to reduced light conditions paired with herbicide contamination. We compared responses to those observed when both stressors remained static over time – the current ‘standard’ method used in multiple stressor experiments.

Variations in stressor intensity and synchronicity tested, including (from left to right): static-static, static-fluctuating or fluctuating-static, synchronous (in-phase), and asynchronous (out-phase) fluctuations.

Under high-intensity stressor treatments, asynchronous fluctuations reduced seagrass biomass 36% more than those exposed to static stressor conditions. And this difference was found despite all treatments being exposed to the same average level of stress.

Our results provide evidence that there are differences in biological responses dependent on how stressors are introduced to the environment. A finding that suggests conclusions drawn from past research might not provide a comprehensive understanding of multiple stressor effects in the real world.

High-intensity, asynchronous (i.e., out-phase) stressor fluctuations had a greater impact on seagrass biomass reduction compared to static stressors, but only under the most stressed conditions.

We propose that future multiple stressor experiments incorporate environmentally relevant changes in stressor intensity and synchronicity. Adopting this approach may provide more accurate information of multiple stressor effects that can aid in the development of better conservation and management strategies, not only for seagrass, but for all ecosystems.

0 Comments

Recent Posts
  • Smarter monitoring for healthier oceans: How the GLOW team uses FishID
  • Mapping shellfish reefs in southeast Queensland for protection, management and restoration
  • New Paper: Integrating socioeconomic and ecological data into restoration practice
  • Fish AI Consortium Presentation: Rapid improvements in fisheries monitoring with underwater computer vision
  • Co-occurrence of ecosystem services to inform global mangrove conservation planning
Archives
  • May 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • April 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • August 2023
  • November 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • November 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
Categories
  • Blue Carbon
  • Communication
  • Conference
  • Conservation
  • FishID projects
  • Jobs
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Research
  • Uncategorized

Climate smart mangrove restoration 

Previous thumb

Greater Consideration of Animals Will Enhance Coastal Restoration Outcomes

Next thumb
Scroll
PhD APPLICATIONS OPEN

Range of projects available with up to $15,000 funds for field work and collaborative travel.

Find out more

PARTNERING FOR CHANGE

GLOW is proud to be an active member of the Global Mangrove Alliance.

Check out the GMA website

@2018 Griffith University, CRICOS Provider - 00233E. Images: Tom Rayner, Anusha Rajkaran and via Creative Commons.
  • Home
  • New initiatives
  • Partners
  • Tools
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Opportunities
  • Contact