• Home
  • New initiatives
  • Partners
  • Tools
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Opportunities
  • Contact

Integrating Artificial Intelligence and Citizen Science can Supercharge Ecological Monitoring

  • Posted by Marina Richardson
  • On October 19, 2020

Integrating Artificial Intelligence and Citizen Science can Supercharge Ecological Monitoring

By Dr. Eva McClure

 

People often imagine the future of technology, and science fiction has depicted many dystopian futures where artificial intelligence (AI) has taken over human civilisation. While AI surpassing human cognition is still in the realms of science fiction, AI technology and software with the capacity to perform tasks otherwise requiring human intelligence are being harnessed across many disciplines. In ecology, AI is becoming increasingly sort-after, but we are yet to realise its full potential.

Ecological monitoring is seeing a rapid uptake of AI and citizen science, scientific projects that engage volunteers of varying levels of expertise. These techniques allow scientists to collect and process volumes of data that were not previously possible using conventional methods. Ecological monitoring is integral to environmental management and biological conservation, but with advances in technology and the ability to collect big data sets, data processing has become a major bottleneck that requires novel solutions.

Until recently, citizen science and AI have been applied mostly in isolation. Our feature perspective highlights that integrating the computer power of AI with the people power of citizen science for collection and processing of large data sets can supercharge outcomes for ecological monitoring and conservation action.

Example of beneficial outcomes from integrating citizen science (CS) and artificial intelligence (AI), such as improved cost-effectiveness, data processing, accuracy, and stakeholder engagement, resulting in more efficient monitoring and improved conservation actions.

One such example of integrated AI-CS approaches is eBird, one of the world’s largest biodiversity-related citizen science projects, engaging >350,000 participants to gather data on >10,000 bird species. eBird has created a Human/Computer Learning Network to allow for the exchange of feedback and active learning between humans and machines for bird identification, to improve data quality for improved conservation and research outcomes.

AI is not yet renowned for serendipitous discovery in ecology, but unsupervised ‘deep learning’ may hold potential. Deep learning algorithms can automatically learn, extract features, and predict from data and so are becoming sought-after in monitoring to process raw images, videos, and audio. While the use of AI for these processes could conceivably replace the need for humans in ecological monitoring, there is intrinsic benefit in maintaining a human connection through citizen science involvement, such as enhancing the relationship between the public and the natural world.

So how does one decide whether to implement citizen science, AI, or both, for ecological monitoring? Managers of large ecological monitoring projects often have little guidance on which technique best suits their resource capacity and objectives. Based on current literature, we highlight key project attributes for consideration by project managers, to help guide these decisions.

 

Project attributes placed towards either citizen science (CS) or artificial intelligence (AI) indicate relatively higher importance for that technique, but not a lack of importance for the other technique. Project attributes placed in the middle indicate equally high importance for both CS and AI. All project attributes would be important to consider for integrated approaches.

Our study highlights that contrary to the popular human vs machine science fiction theme, there can be great benefits in the integration of citizen science and AI for improving methods in ecological monitoring, enhancing understanding of the natural world, and promoting positive outcomes for environmental management.

0 Comments

Recent Posts
  • Smarter monitoring for healthier oceans: How the GLOW team uses FishID
  • Mapping shellfish reefs in southeast Queensland for protection, management and restoration
  • New Paper: Integrating socioeconomic and ecological data into restoration practice
  • Fish AI Consortium Presentation: Rapid improvements in fisheries monitoring with underwater computer vision
  • Co-occurrence of ecosystem services to inform global mangrove conservation planning
Archives
  • May 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • April 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • August 2023
  • November 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • November 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
Categories
  • Blue Carbon
  • Communication
  • Conference
  • Conservation
  • FishID projects
  • Jobs
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Research
  • Uncategorized

How can computer vision supercharge fish connectivity research?

Previous thumb

Deep learning for ecological monitoring: performance in novel habitats and benefits of varied training data

Next thumb
Scroll
PhD APPLICATIONS OPEN

Range of projects available with up to $15,000 funds for field work and collaborative travel.

Find out more

PARTNERING FOR CHANGE

GLOW is proud to be an active member of the Global Mangrove Alliance.

Check out the GMA website

@2018 Griffith University, CRICOS Provider - 00233E. Images: Tom Rayner, Anusha Rajkaran and via Creative Commons.
  • Home
  • New initiatives
  • Partners
  • Tools
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Opportunities
  • Contact